KnowledgePlanet Firefly Review

A few months ago I started a series of posts reviewing various eLearning development tools. Life and work intervened, so I haven’t been very diligent about getting the reviews out. I’ve got several posts started about various topics like mobile learning, podcasting, and personal learning environments, but I want to finish up some of the reviews first.

When I started evaluating tools, Firefly topped my list because I really needed a good simulation tool. Of all the tools and companies I looked into, KnowledgePlanet impressed me the most. They were one of the few companies that really seems to understand the instructional development process and the unique challenges of developing online training. They understand that developing online training is not just about converting classroom training or shoveling PowerPoint onto an LMS. They understand eLearning developers their particular needs. They have developed tools specifically for creating effective online training that have their foundations in instructional design, not programming. The tools didn’t always have all the features I wanted or needed, but I felt at the core, they understood online training.

KnowledgePlanet has two tools that I looked into seriously: Firefly Simulation Developer and Firefly Publisher. If I had my choice and money was no object, I would buy their products. However, KnowledgePlanet’s tools are very expensive, so I probably won’t purchase them at this time. I wish I could. I like the products, and the people I talked to. They were very helpful and informative without be overly “salesy” or pushy.

Firefly Publisher

I attended a webinar for this product, so did not try it myself. Publisher is a server-based development tool that requires no installation on the client computer. It is entirely web-based. I love web-based applications. I hate software licensing based on an installation. I loathe having to drag my laptop home from work because that is were my apps are installed. Web based applications offer several distinct advantages over traditional install-based apps, especially if your organization has very strict IT policies. For me it means the data is backed-up and if my laptop dies or get stolen (which just happened at my workplace), my projects are not lost.

Firefly Publisher was specifically designed for team based authoring, without all the overhead of a full-blown LCMS. It includes a lot of useful team based tools, like creating tasks and workflow management, but doesn’t burden you with a complex administration scheme or interface. It is designed for people who actually create eLearning, not people who manage it or administer it.

In the authoring tool market, there are great tools for individual developers and some good enterprise wide LCMS tools, but nothing in the middle. Firefly is that product in the middle. Small to medium sized organizations can really benefit from Firefly Publisher. The authoring environment is flexible and simple enough for novices, but robust enough for experienced developers.

Some of the features I particularly liked:

  • SME Review – You can have people review courses, but you don’t need a license for them. You only need a license for developers.
  • Task Management – A simple tool for adding tasks to screens, like “Replace graphic” or “redo audio”. It’s basically a “To Do” list for each screen, something I maintain manually now. You can run a report for an entire project to get the global picture.
  • Repository – All assets (text, audio, interactions) are stored in a media repository and can be reused.
  • Remote linking for assets – You don’t have store them in the library, you can point to a URL.
  • HTML Editing – Allows you to edit HTML, and won’t step on it. You can add HTML to the theme, so it’s available on every page.

The version I looked at didn’t have a PowerPoint import, but it was in development. It also didn’t support CSS, but you could put it in the HTML for a theme and it would work. So, even though the software had a gap (in my opinion), there was a simple work around.

My bottom line – I want this tool.

Since this post is getting long, I’ll talk about Firefly Simulation developer in the next blog post.

As always, please let me know if you questions, comments, or a different opinion.

3 Responses to KnowledgePlanet Firefly Review

  1. Thanks for your excellent review, Gary.

    I have a few side notes you and other readers may find useful:

    1. FFP 3.0 was released about 4 months ago and now features a very robust PowerPoint import feature, including the ability to select individual slides for import with or without their backgrounds.

    2. The entire editing environment is actually a CSS-based one. The toolbar and properties grid you saw on the left actually assign CSS properties to elements, and 99% of all existing CSS properties are exposed. You can also create CSS selectors (both classes and elements), using the Format > Style Rule menu item.

    3. FFP 3.0 added a bunch of interesting features, including Serious Games. See for the initial announcement. With regard to the Games, imagine doing an assessment with an entire game layer on top, including soundtracks, scoring, animations, time limits etc…

    You’re always invited to take part in one of the FFP 3.0 Webinars. If you follow the above link, you will see the old webinar schedule, but clicking a date will actually take you to our new ones.

    As for pricing, if you really do have some interest in the tools, let us know. We can be creative at times, especially when our customers get out into the world to help us market as you seem quite capable of doing. We also recently added a combined pricing model for Firefly and Firefly Publisher on a SAS basis — pay a per month fee instead of a huge chunk of cash up front. Definately worth looking into.

    Thanks again for the review. It was very well done.


  2. Dave,
    Thanks for the update. I figured things had changed since I looked at the program, but still wanted to get my thoughts out. It is a great tool. I must have been looking at it right before the upgrade. I’m glad to hear about the CSS support, as a web developer I think that is important.

    Also, I think the ROI for Firefly is good, it’s just hard to prove that up front sometimes. When I have time to fight that battle, I’ll let you know. Right now, I’m just trying to get others to understand the benefits of eLearning in general.

  3. fornetti says:

    I do not believe this

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: